Party Waiting on finish selections
Party Revised drawings sent
Party Inspection booked Thu
Party Confirmed for Mon
Owner, architect, city, subs - every project lives or dies on who you remembered to follow up with. Here's a build where the chasing happens on its own, and you only hear about the thing that actually needs a decision.
Owner, architect, the city, every sub - who owes what, what's blocking the schedule, all in one place instead of scattered across your phone.
The tenant's finish selections are holding up the schedule. The nudge goes out in your company's voice before the delay ever reaches you.
As each piece lands, the milestone moves and the client and architect see it live. You stopped being the status report.
Every routine follow-up handled itself. The only thing that hit your phone was the change-order decision that needed the builder.
3 active jobs on schedule. 9 follow-ups sent and answered today. Inspections booked.
Suite 240: tenant requested a layout change that adds $6k and 3 days. Needs your approval before the architect revises.
The kind of coordination layer a project manager spends years building, tuned to how a commercial builder actually runs jobs.
For a builder, this is the whole game: jobs stay on schedule because the chasing happens without you, not because you remembered.
If we're wrong, the conversation ends here. If we're close, this is rarely the only thing you're holding together by hand.
We built this from public information. How close did we get?
Tell us where we got it right, or where we missed. Under a minute.